Škrijelj, Rifat

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
a93c0313-f807-4b4e-84a7-f3967e210d57
  • Škrijelj, Rifat (2)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Alien freshwater fish species in the Balkans-Vectors and pathways of introduction

Piria, Marina; Simonović, Predrag; Kalogianni, Eleni; Vardakas, Leonidas; Koutsikos, Nicholas; Zanella, Davor; Ristovska, Milica; Apostolou, Apostolos; Adrović, Avdul; Mrdak, Danilo; Tarkan, Ali Serhan; Milošević, Dragana; Zanella, Linda N; Bakiu, Rigers; Ekmekçi, F Güler; Povž, Metka; Korro, Kastriot; Nikolić, Vera; Škrijelj, Rifat; Kostov, Vasil; Gregori, Andrej; Joy, Michael K

(2017)

TY  - GEN
AU  - Piria, Marina
AU  - Simonović, Predrag
AU  - Kalogianni, Eleni
AU  - Vardakas, Leonidas
AU  - Koutsikos, Nicholas
AU  - Zanella, Davor
AU  - Ristovska, Milica
AU  - Apostolou, Apostolos
AU  - Adrović, Avdul
AU  - Mrdak, Danilo
AU  - Tarkan, Ali Serhan
AU  - Milošević, Dragana
AU  - Zanella, Linda N
AU  - Bakiu, Rigers
AU  - Ekmekçi, F Güler
AU  - Povž, Metka
AU  - Korro, Kastriot
AU  - Nikolić, Vera
AU  - Škrijelj, Rifat
AU  - Kostov, Vasil
AU  - Gregori, Andrej
AU  - Joy, Michael K
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/faf.12242
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2842
AB  - Fish introductions, particularly in areas of high biological diversity and endemism, represent a major threat for biodiversity. In the Balkan Peninsula, 60 fish species have been introduced to date, of which 36 have become naturalized in inland waters. Since the Balkans are one of the world's 35 biodiversity hot spots, this large presence of alien fish species poses a serious threat for the stability of freshwater ecosystems and the survival of the native ichthyofauna and of aquatic biodiversity in general. The motivation for the introductions, and the historical timeline, varies among the Balkan states. Despite recent attempts to implement and align legislation aimed at preventing the introduction of potentially invasive species, and the implementation of rigorous controls of introductions and increased protection of open waters, the majority of current introductions remain intentional, primarily via aquaculture. This review article provides a historical overview of freshwater fish introductions, the motivation behind them a nd the current distribution of alien freshwater fishes in the Balkans. The ecological implications and future perspectives concerning alien fish species in the region are also discussed.
T2  - Fish and Fisheries
T1  - Alien freshwater fish species in the Balkans-Vectors and pathways of introduction
DO  - 10.1111/faf.12242
ER  - 
@misc{
author = "Piria, Marina and Simonović, Predrag and Kalogianni, Eleni and Vardakas, Leonidas and Koutsikos, Nicholas and Zanella, Davor and Ristovska, Milica and Apostolou, Apostolos and Adrović, Avdul and Mrdak, Danilo and Tarkan, Ali Serhan and Milošević, Dragana and Zanella, Linda N and Bakiu, Rigers and Ekmekçi, F Güler and Povž, Metka and Korro, Kastriot and Nikolić, Vera and Škrijelj, Rifat and Kostov, Vasil and Gregori, Andrej and Joy, Michael K",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Fish introductions, particularly in areas of high biological diversity and endemism, represent a major threat for biodiversity. In the Balkan Peninsula, 60 fish species have been introduced to date, of which 36 have become naturalized in inland waters. Since the Balkans are one of the world's 35 biodiversity hot spots, this large presence of alien fish species poses a serious threat for the stability of freshwater ecosystems and the survival of the native ichthyofauna and of aquatic biodiversity in general. The motivation for the introductions, and the historical timeline, varies among the Balkan states. Despite recent attempts to implement and align legislation aimed at preventing the introduction of potentially invasive species, and the implementation of rigorous controls of introductions and increased protection of open waters, the majority of current introductions remain intentional, primarily via aquaculture. This review article provides a historical overview of freshwater fish introductions, the motivation behind them a nd the current distribution of alien freshwater fishes in the Balkans. The ecological implications and future perspectives concerning alien fish species in the region are also discussed.",
journal = "Fish and Fisheries",
title = "Alien freshwater fish species in the Balkans-Vectors and pathways of introduction",
doi = "10.1111/faf.12242"
}
Piria, M., Simonović, P., Kalogianni, E., Vardakas, L., Koutsikos, N., Zanella, D., Ristovska, M., Apostolou, A., Adrović, A., Mrdak, D., Tarkan, A. S., Milošević, D., Zanella, L. N., Bakiu, R., Ekmekçi, F. G., Povž, M., Korro, K., Nikolić, V., Škrijelj, R., Kostov, V., Gregori, A.,& Joy, M. K.. (2017). Alien freshwater fish species in the Balkans-Vectors and pathways of introduction. in Fish and Fisheries.
https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12242
Piria M, Simonović P, Kalogianni E, Vardakas L, Koutsikos N, Zanella D, Ristovska M, Apostolou A, Adrović A, Mrdak D, Tarkan AS, Milošević D, Zanella LN, Bakiu R, Ekmekçi FG, Povž M, Korro K, Nikolić V, Škrijelj R, Kostov V, Gregori A, Joy MK. Alien freshwater fish species in the Balkans-Vectors and pathways of introduction. in Fish and Fisheries. 2017;.
doi:10.1111/faf.12242 .
Piria, Marina, Simonović, Predrag, Kalogianni, Eleni, Vardakas, Leonidas, Koutsikos, Nicholas, Zanella, Davor, Ristovska, Milica, Apostolou, Apostolos, Adrović, Avdul, Mrdak, Danilo, Tarkan, Ali Serhan, Milošević, Dragana, Zanella, Linda N, Bakiu, Rigers, Ekmekçi, F Güler, Povž, Metka, Korro, Kastriot, Nikolić, Vera, Škrijelj, Rifat, Kostov, Vasil, Gregori, Andrej, Joy, Michael K, "Alien freshwater fish species in the Balkans-Vectors and pathways of introduction" in Fish and Fisheries (2017),
https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12242 . .
9
52
33
56

Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System

Milačić, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Simonović, Predrag; Povž, Metka; Piria, Marina; Treer, Tomislav; Adrović, Avdul; Škrijelj, Rifat; Nikolić, Vera; Simić, Vladica

(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Simonović, Predrag
AU  - Povž, Metka
AU  - Piria, Marina
AU  - Treer, Tomislav
AU  - Adrović, Avdul
AU  - Škrijelj, Rifat
AU  - Nikolić, Vera
AU  - Simić, Vladica
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2577
AB  - On the survey of the recent records, the fish and lamprey fauna of the River Sava catchment consists of 74 species, 15 of which being considered alien. The indigenous species diversity, explained using the relation N = 0. 546 A 0.232, fits well into the range common for large catchments in Europe. Both taxonomic and ecological diversity, as well as the character of fish communities in streams and rivers, are strongly correlated with the stream order. On the relative abundance of species in fish communities, the upper rhithron fish communities cluster distinctly from those belonging to the middle rhithron, within which several subgroups of fish communities were distinguishable. Fish communities of the middle rhithron character in streams and small rivers stand distinctly apart from those belonging to particular sections of large rivers (e.g., the Rivers Sava, Drina, Vrbas, and Bosna), with the transitional type of middle rhithron fish community in larger rivers (e.g., those in the Rivers Una and Sana) that resemble more to the fish communities common in middle rhithron streams. Fish communities in the middle section of the River Sava in Croatia and in the bordering area with Bosnia and Herzegovina mainly belong to the lower rhithron, attaining the character of potamon in the most downstream, Serbian section. River Sava’s fish communities strongly interact with the ones occurring in the most downstream sections of their largest tributaries, e.g., the Rivers Una, Vrbas, Bosna, Drina, and Kolubara, which makes them very similar in structure in the areas of river mouths. Classification of fish communities based solely on the presence and absence of species revealed similar general pattern of fish community classification, though with the more sharp delimitation between those belonging to the upper and middle rhithron on one and to the lower rhithron and potamon on the other side. That was supported by the determination of fish communities belonging to the upper rhithron with brown trout Salmo cf. trutta, European bullhead Cottus gobio, and minnow Phoxinus phoxinus as the most common fish species. Fish communities belonging to the middle rhithron were determined mainly with chub Squalius cephalus and spirlin Alburnoides bipunctatus, whereas brook barbel Barbus balcanicus and stone loach Barbatula barbatula occurred in both upper rhithron and middle rhithron. Nase Chondrostoma nasus were associated with both middle and lower rhithron fish communities. The most common fish species that determine the lower rhithron fish communities were common bream Abramis brama, ide Idus idus, and bleak Alburnus alburnus, with the northern pike Esox lucius, Balon’s ruffe Gymnocephalus baloni, and racer goby Neogobius gymnotrachelus as significant species explaining fish communities of both lower rhithron and potamon. The level of production of fish in the River Sava varies remarkably within the sections with the similar ecological features, as well as between the sections that differ for the type of fish community. The greatest biomass and annual natural production were recorded in the sections homing the potamon and lower rhithron fish communities, especially in the flooding areas of side arms and oxbows which serve as spawning areas and nurseries. A total of 15 alien fish species was recorded in the River Sava catchment, the Prussian carp Carassius gibelio and brown bullhead Ameiurus nebulosus being assessed the most invasive in the areas with the potamon fish community. A strong impact from both long-term and recent stocking with alien hatchery-reared brown trout strains and rainbow trout in the upper rhithron fish communities was recently recognized. Mudminnow Umbra krameri and huchen (or Danube salmon) Hucho hucho are considered the two most threatened fish species of the River Sava catchment, where various types of riverbed modifications, especially the damming, were seen the most prominent threatening factors for fish diversity.
PB  - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T1  - Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14
SP  - 361
EP  - 400
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Simonović, Predrag and Povž, Metka and Piria, Marina and Treer, Tomislav and Adrović, Avdul and Škrijelj, Rifat and Nikolić, Vera and Simić, Vladica",
year = "2015",
abstract = "On the survey of the recent records, the fish and lamprey fauna of the River Sava catchment consists of 74 species, 15 of which being considered alien. The indigenous species diversity, explained using the relation N = 0. 546 A 0.232, fits well into the range common for large catchments in Europe. Both taxonomic and ecological diversity, as well as the character of fish communities in streams and rivers, are strongly correlated with the stream order. On the relative abundance of species in fish communities, the upper rhithron fish communities cluster distinctly from those belonging to the middle rhithron, within which several subgroups of fish communities were distinguishable. Fish communities of the middle rhithron character in streams and small rivers stand distinctly apart from those belonging to particular sections of large rivers (e.g., the Rivers Sava, Drina, Vrbas, and Bosna), with the transitional type of middle rhithron fish community in larger rivers (e.g., those in the Rivers Una and Sana) that resemble more to the fish communities common in middle rhithron streams. Fish communities in the middle section of the River Sava in Croatia and in the bordering area with Bosnia and Herzegovina mainly belong to the lower rhithron, attaining the character of potamon in the most downstream, Serbian section. River Sava’s fish communities strongly interact with the ones occurring in the most downstream sections of their largest tributaries, e.g., the Rivers Una, Vrbas, Bosna, Drina, and Kolubara, which makes them very similar in structure in the areas of river mouths. Classification of fish communities based solely on the presence and absence of species revealed similar general pattern of fish community classification, though with the more sharp delimitation between those belonging to the upper and middle rhithron on one and to the lower rhithron and potamon on the other side. That was supported by the determination of fish communities belonging to the upper rhithron with brown trout Salmo cf. trutta, European bullhead Cottus gobio, and minnow Phoxinus phoxinus as the most common fish species. Fish communities belonging to the middle rhithron were determined mainly with chub Squalius cephalus and spirlin Alburnoides bipunctatus, whereas brook barbel Barbus balcanicus and stone loach Barbatula barbatula occurred in both upper rhithron and middle rhithron. Nase Chondrostoma nasus were associated with both middle and lower rhithron fish communities. The most common fish species that determine the lower rhithron fish communities were common bream Abramis brama, ide Idus idus, and bleak Alburnus alburnus, with the northern pike Esox lucius, Balon’s ruffe Gymnocephalus baloni, and racer goby Neogobius gymnotrachelus as significant species explaining fish communities of both lower rhithron and potamon. The level of production of fish in the River Sava varies remarkably within the sections with the similar ecological features, as well as between the sections that differ for the type of fish community. The greatest biomass and annual natural production were recorded in the sections homing the potamon and lower rhithron fish communities, especially in the flooding areas of side arms and oxbows which serve as spawning areas and nurseries. A total of 15 alien fish species was recorded in the River Sava catchment, the Prussian carp Carassius gibelio and brown bullhead Ameiurus nebulosus being assessed the most invasive in the areas with the potamon fish community. A strong impact from both long-term and recent stocking with alien hatchery-reared brown trout strains and rainbow trout in the upper rhithron fish communities was recently recognized. Mudminnow Umbra krameri and huchen (or Danube salmon) Hucho hucho are considered the two most threatened fish species of the River Sava catchment, where various types of riverbed modifications, especially the damming, were seen the most prominent threatening factors for fish diversity.",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River",
booktitle = "Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14",
pages = "361-400"
}
Milačić, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Simonović, P., Povž, M., Piria, M., Treer, T., Adrović, A., Škrijelj, R., Nikolić, V.,& Simić, V.. (2015). Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System. in The Sava River
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg., 361-400.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14
Milačić R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Simonović P, Povž M, Piria M, Treer T, Adrović A, Škrijelj R, Nikolić V, Simić V. Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System. in The Sava River. 2015;:361-400.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14 .
Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Simonović, Predrag, Povž, Metka, Piria, Marina, Treer, Tomislav, Adrović, Avdul, Škrijelj, Rifat, Nikolić, Vera, Simić, Vladica, "Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System" in The Sava River (2015):361-400,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14 . .
17
17