Ščančar, Janez

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
49a3f344-2478-4201-94b3-fdaab9092e30
  • Ščančar, Janez (9)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Fauna of the Riparian Ecosystems: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals

Milačić, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Crnobrnja-Isailović, Jelka; Adrović, Avdul; Ćaleta, Marko; Ćosić, Nada; Jelić, Dušan; Kotrošan, Dušan; Lisičić, Duje; Marinković, Saša; Poboljšaj, Katja; Presetnik, Primož; Sekulić, Goran

(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Crnobrnja-Isailović, Jelka
AU  - Adrović, Avdul
AU  - Ćaleta, Marko
AU  - Ćosić, Nada
AU  - Jelić, Dušan
AU  - Kotrošan, Dušan
AU  - Lisičić, Duje
AU  - Marinković, Saša
AU  - Poboljšaj, Katja
AU  - Presetnik, Primož
AU  - Sekulić, Goran
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%252F978-3-662-44034-6_15
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2559
AB  - In pristine environments, riparian ecosystems are continuously distributed along large river flows. As ecotones, they harbor more species diversity than ecosystems bordering them from both sides. Along the Sava River flow, riparian ecosystems are discontinuously distributed, being preserved mainly in protected areas of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia. Nine riparian ecosystem types could be listed, harboring in total 17 amphibian, 13 reptile, more than 280 bird, and 80 mammal species. Looking at global species conservation status (global IUCN status: 2009, amphibians and reptiles; 2012, birds; 2008, mammals), the highest concerns should be focused on Triturus dobrogicus (NT), Emys orbicularis (NT), Falco cherrug (EN), Aythya nyroca (NT), Rhinolophus euryale (VU), R. ferrumequinum (NT), R. hipposideros (NT), Barbastella barbastellus (VU), Miniopterus schreibersii (NT), Myotis bechsteinii (VU), M. blythii (NT), M. dasycneme (NT), Plecotus macrobullaris (NT), Lutra lutra (NT), and Eliomys quercinus (NT). Most of the vertebrate species occurring along the Sava River are also protected by national legislations. However, it seems that both their populations and native habitats need more appropriate treatment at place.
PB  - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T1  - Fauna of the Riparian Ecosystems: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_15
SP  - 401
EP  - 435
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Crnobrnja-Isailović, Jelka and Adrović, Avdul and Ćaleta, Marko and Ćosić, Nada and Jelić, Dušan and Kotrošan, Dušan and Lisičić, Duje and Marinković, Saša and Poboljšaj, Katja and Presetnik, Primož and Sekulić, Goran",
year = "2015",
abstract = "In pristine environments, riparian ecosystems are continuously distributed along large river flows. As ecotones, they harbor more species diversity than ecosystems bordering them from both sides. Along the Sava River flow, riparian ecosystems are discontinuously distributed, being preserved mainly in protected areas of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia. Nine riparian ecosystem types could be listed, harboring in total 17 amphibian, 13 reptile, more than 280 bird, and 80 mammal species. Looking at global species conservation status (global IUCN status: 2009, amphibians and reptiles; 2012, birds; 2008, mammals), the highest concerns should be focused on Triturus dobrogicus (NT), Emys orbicularis (NT), Falco cherrug (EN), Aythya nyroca (NT), Rhinolophus euryale (VU), R. ferrumequinum (NT), R. hipposideros (NT), Barbastella barbastellus (VU), Miniopterus schreibersii (NT), Myotis bechsteinii (VU), M. blythii (NT), M. dasycneme (NT), Plecotus macrobullaris (NT), Lutra lutra (NT), and Eliomys quercinus (NT). Most of the vertebrate species occurring along the Sava River are also protected by national legislations. However, it seems that both their populations and native habitats need more appropriate treatment at place.",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River",
booktitle = "Fauna of the Riparian Ecosystems: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_15",
pages = "401-435"
}
Milačić, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Crnobrnja-Isailović, J., Adrović, A., Ćaleta, M., Ćosić, N., Jelić, D., Kotrošan, D., Lisičić, D., Marinković, S., Poboljšaj, K., Presetnik, P.,& Sekulić, G.. (2015). Fauna of the Riparian Ecosystems: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals. in The Sava River
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg., 401-435.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_15
Milačić R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Crnobrnja-Isailović J, Adrović A, Ćaleta M, Ćosić N, Jelić D, Kotrošan D, Lisičić D, Marinković S, Poboljšaj K, Presetnik P, Sekulić G. Fauna of the Riparian Ecosystems: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals. in The Sava River. 2015;:401-435.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_15 .
Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Crnobrnja-Isailović, Jelka, Adrović, Avdul, Ćaleta, Marko, Ćosić, Nada, Jelić, Dušan, Kotrošan, Dušan, Lisičić, Duje, Marinković, Saša, Poboljšaj, Katja, Presetnik, Primož, Sekulić, Goran, "Fauna of the Riparian Ecosystems: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals" in The Sava River (2015):401-435,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_15 . .
5
5

Genotoxicological Studies of Lower Stretch of the Sava River

Milačič, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Vuković-Gačić, Branka; Kolarević, Stoimir; Sunjog, Karolina; Tomović, Jelena; Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta; Knežević-Vukčević, Jelena; Paunović, Momir; Gačić, Zoran

(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vuković-Gačić, Branka
AU  - Kolarević, Stoimir
AU  - Sunjog, Karolina
AU  - Tomović, Jelena
AU  - Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta
AU  - Knežević-Vukčević, Jelena
AU  - Paunović, Momir
AU  - Gačić, Zoran
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2579
AB  - Genotoxicity monitoring of the lower stretch of the Sava River was performed by the combined approach of in situ assessment of genotoxicity and active biomonitoring of two species of mussels from the Unionidae family, Unio pictorum and Unio tumidus. Genotoxic response was studied using comet assay on hemocytes. For active biomonitoring, the mussels were acclimated to controlled laboratory conditions for 10 days and then exposed at two sites in the Sava River in the area of the city of Belgrade. Hemolymph of exposed specimens of each species was taken after 7, 14, and 30 days of exposure. For in situ assessment, the mussels were collected from five sites in the lower flow of the Sava River. The mussels were sampled immediately after the acclimation served as controls in both types of monitoring procedures. The results of our studies indicated the presence of genotoxic pollution at all studied sites at the Sava River. The level of DNA damage varied at different sites depending on the source and level of pollution. The response to genotoxic pollution was evident at the site in the urban area of Belgrade city, as well as at the sites far from the large urban settlements, suggesting that the lower flow of the Sava River is under pollution pressure.
PB  - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T1  - Genotoxicological Studies of Lower Stretch of the Sava River
VL  - 31
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6
SP  - 437
EP  - 452
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Vuković-Gačić, Branka and Kolarević, Stoimir and Sunjog, Karolina and Tomović, Jelena and Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta and Knežević-Vukčević, Jelena and Paunović, Momir and Gačić, Zoran",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Genotoxicity monitoring of the lower stretch of the Sava River was performed by the combined approach of in situ assessment of genotoxicity and active biomonitoring of two species of mussels from the Unionidae family, Unio pictorum and Unio tumidus. Genotoxic response was studied using comet assay on hemocytes. For active biomonitoring, the mussels were acclimated to controlled laboratory conditions for 10 days and then exposed at two sites in the Sava River in the area of the city of Belgrade. Hemolymph of exposed specimens of each species was taken after 7, 14, and 30 days of exposure. For in situ assessment, the mussels were collected from five sites in the lower flow of the Sava River. The mussels were sampled immediately after the acclimation served as controls in both types of monitoring procedures. The results of our studies indicated the presence of genotoxic pollution at all studied sites at the Sava River. The level of DNA damage varied at different sites depending on the source and level of pollution. The response to genotoxic pollution was evident at the site in the urban area of Belgrade city, as well as at the sites far from the large urban settlements, suggesting that the lower flow of the Sava River is under pollution pressure.",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River",
booktitle = "Genotoxicological Studies of Lower Stretch of the Sava River",
volume = "31",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6",
pages = "437-452"
}
Milačič, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Vuković-Gačić, B., Kolarević, S., Sunjog, K., Tomović, J., Kračun-Kolarević, M., Knežević-Vukčević, J., Paunović, M.,& Gačić, Z.. (2015). Genotoxicological Studies of Lower Stretch of the Sava River. in The Sava River
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg., 31, 437-452.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6
Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Vuković-Gačić B, Kolarević S, Sunjog K, Tomović J, Kračun-Kolarević M, Knežević-Vukčević J, Paunović M, Gačić Z. Genotoxicological Studies of Lower Stretch of the Sava River. in The Sava River. 2015;31:437-452.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6 .
Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Vuković-Gačić, Branka, Kolarević, Stoimir, Sunjog, Karolina, Tomović, Jelena, Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta, Knežević-Vukčević, Jelena, Paunović, Momir, Gačić, Zoran, "Genotoxicological Studies of Lower Stretch of the Sava River" in The Sava River, 31 (2015):437-452,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6 . .
3
17
3

Microbial Characterisation of the Sava River

Milačić, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Kapetanović, Damir; Vardić Smrzlić, Irena; Valić, Damir; Teskeredžić, Emin; Kolarević, Stoimir; Sunjog, Karolina; Tomović, Jelena; Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta; Knežević-Vukčević, Jelena; Paunović, Momir; Gačić, Zoran; Vuković-Gačić, Branka

(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Kapetanović, Damir
AU  - Vardić Smrzlić, Irena
AU  - Valić, Damir
AU  - Teskeredžić, Emin
AU  - Kolarević, Stoimir
AU  - Sunjog, Karolina
AU  - Tomović, Jelena
AU  - Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta
AU  - Knežević-Vukčević, Jelena
AU  - Paunović, Momir
AU  - Gačić, Zoran
AU  - Vuković-Gačić, Branka
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_9
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2569
AB  - Data on the microbiological quality of the freshwater systems under the anthropogenic influence, such as the Sava River, are of the major importance for the water resource management. Furthermore, analyses of the microbial quality of fish meat provide information of the fish as a valuable food resource from the investigated river basin. The health status of the fish, including dynamics of infection and biodiversity of endoparasites, is important bioindicator of changes in the ecosystem structure and function. For the ecosystem-based approach to the Sava River management, investigations of microbiological quality of the Sava River water and the meat of the European chub as the bioindicator organism, as well as dynamics of infection/biodiversity of intestinal parasites Acanthocephala, were performed. The survey comprised the data collected in periods 2005, 2006 and 2012. Microbiological investigation of water was performed in 2006 and 2012, while microbiological analyses of fish meat and ichthyo-parasitological investigation took place during 2005–2006. A high number of heterotrophic bacteria were recorded during 2006 survey, confirmed by the distinctly higher values of the three faecal indicators (total coliform, E. coli and enterococci), and indicated poor water quality downstream of the cities Zagreb and Velika Gorica, as a result of the municipal sewage outlets. The results from 2012 survey indicated the existence of moderate to critical faecal and organic pollution in all samples. Accumulation of the bacteria in the European chub meat was mainly uniform along the watercourse within standards and limitations for the human consumption. Sampling sites downstream cities of Zagreb and Velika Gorica were characterised with the lower prevalence and abundance of two common species of the chub intestinal acanthocephalan parasites, Pomphorhynchus laevis and Acanthocephalus anguillae. Poor microbiological quality of the water and lower distribution of chub intestinal parasites were related to the anthropogenic influence, downstream of the urban areas.
PB  - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T1  - Microbial Characterisation of the Sava River
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_9
SP  - 201
EP  - 228
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Kapetanović, Damir and Vardić Smrzlić, Irena and Valić, Damir and Teskeredžić, Emin and Kolarević, Stoimir and Sunjog, Karolina and Tomović, Jelena and Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta and Knežević-Vukčević, Jelena and Paunović, Momir and Gačić, Zoran and Vuković-Gačić, Branka",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Data on the microbiological quality of the freshwater systems under the anthropogenic influence, such as the Sava River, are of the major importance for the water resource management. Furthermore, analyses of the microbial quality of fish meat provide information of the fish as a valuable food resource from the investigated river basin. The health status of the fish, including dynamics of infection and biodiversity of endoparasites, is important bioindicator of changes in the ecosystem structure and function. For the ecosystem-based approach to the Sava River management, investigations of microbiological quality of the Sava River water and the meat of the European chub as the bioindicator organism, as well as dynamics of infection/biodiversity of intestinal parasites Acanthocephala, were performed. The survey comprised the data collected in periods 2005, 2006 and 2012. Microbiological investigation of water was performed in 2006 and 2012, while microbiological analyses of fish meat and ichthyo-parasitological investigation took place during 2005–2006. A high number of heterotrophic bacteria were recorded during 2006 survey, confirmed by the distinctly higher values of the three faecal indicators (total coliform, E. coli and enterococci), and indicated poor water quality downstream of the cities Zagreb and Velika Gorica, as a result of the municipal sewage outlets. The results from 2012 survey indicated the existence of moderate to critical faecal and organic pollution in all samples. Accumulation of the bacteria in the European chub meat was mainly uniform along the watercourse within standards and limitations for the human consumption. Sampling sites downstream cities of Zagreb and Velika Gorica were characterised with the lower prevalence and abundance of two common species of the chub intestinal acanthocephalan parasites, Pomphorhynchus laevis and Acanthocephalus anguillae. Poor microbiological quality of the water and lower distribution of chub intestinal parasites were related to the anthropogenic influence, downstream of the urban areas.",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River",
booktitle = "Microbial Characterisation of the Sava River",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_9",
pages = "201-228"
}
Milačić, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Kapetanović, D., Vardić Smrzlić, I., Valić, D., Teskeredžić, E., Kolarević, S., Sunjog, K., Tomović, J., Kračun-Kolarević, M., Knežević-Vukčević, J., Paunović, M., Gačić, Z.,& Vuković-Gačić, B.. (2015). Microbial Characterisation of the Sava River. in The Sava River
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg., 201-228.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_9
Milačić R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Kapetanović D, Vardić Smrzlić I, Valić D, Teskeredžić E, Kolarević S, Sunjog K, Tomović J, Kračun-Kolarević M, Knežević-Vukčević J, Paunović M, Gačić Z, Vuković-Gačić B. Microbial Characterisation of the Sava River. in The Sava River. 2015;:201-228.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_9 .
Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Kapetanović, Damir, Vardić Smrzlić, Irena, Valić, Damir, Teskeredžić, Emin, Kolarević, Stoimir, Sunjog, Karolina, Tomović, Jelena, Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta, Knežević-Vukčević, Jelena, Paunović, Momir, Gačić, Zoran, Vuković-Gačić, Branka, "Microbial Characterisation of the Sava River" in The Sava River (2015):201-228,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_9 . .
6
6

Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of the Sava River

Milačič, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Lucić, Andreja; Paunović, Momir; Tomović, Jelena; Kovačević, Simona; Zorić, Katarina; Simić, Vladica; Atanacković, Ana; Marković, Vanja; Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta; Hudina, Sandra; Lajtner, Jasna; Gottstein, Sanja; Milošević, Đurađ; Anđus, Stefan; Žganec, Krešimir; Jaklič, Martina; Simčič, Tatjana; Vilenica, Marina

(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Lucić, Andreja
AU  - Paunović, Momir
AU  - Tomović, Jelena
AU  - Kovačević, Simona
AU  - Zorić, Katarina
AU  - Simić, Vladica
AU  - Atanacković, Ana
AU  - Marković, Vanja
AU  - Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta
AU  - Hudina, Sandra
AU  - Lajtner, Jasna
AU  - Gottstein, Sanja
AU  - Milošević, Đurađ
AU  - Anđus, Stefan
AU  - Žganec, Krešimir
AU  - Jaklič, Martina
AU  - Simčič, Tatjana
AU  - Vilenica, Marina
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_13
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2573
AB  - The objective of this chapter is to present the data on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities along the Sava River, based on investigation performed during 2011 and 2012 at 12 sampling sites within the sector between Vrhovo (Slovenia) and Belgrade (confluence to the Danube). During our study 227 macroinvertebrate taxa were recorded in the Sava River. Having in mind that upper stretch of the Sava River was not covered by this work (alpine and subalpine stretch), as well as based on the review of previous works on the macroinvertebrate fauna of the Sava River, more than 300 species will be confirmed for the Sava River. The data on the distribution of aquatic macroinvertebrates revealed five different stretches—alpine, subalpine, Upper Sava plain, Middle Sava and Lower Sava. Physical habitat degradation, pollution and pressure caused by biological invasions were found to be the main factors of endangerment of aquatic macroinvertebrate fauna diversity. There is an obvious need for further investigation of the Sava River in order to complete the data on aquatic macroinvertebrates and to provide the basis for accurate assessment of environmental status of the river.
PB  - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T1  - Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of the Sava River
VL  - 31
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_13
SP  - 335
EP  - 359
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Lucić, Andreja and Paunović, Momir and Tomović, Jelena and Kovačević, Simona and Zorić, Katarina and Simić, Vladica and Atanacković, Ana and Marković, Vanja and Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta and Hudina, Sandra and Lajtner, Jasna and Gottstein, Sanja and Milošević, Đurađ and Anđus, Stefan and Žganec, Krešimir and Jaklič, Martina and Simčič, Tatjana and Vilenica, Marina",
year = "2015",
abstract = "The objective of this chapter is to present the data on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities along the Sava River, based on investigation performed during 2011 and 2012 at 12 sampling sites within the sector between Vrhovo (Slovenia) and Belgrade (confluence to the Danube). During our study 227 macroinvertebrate taxa were recorded in the Sava River. Having in mind that upper stretch of the Sava River was not covered by this work (alpine and subalpine stretch), as well as based on the review of previous works on the macroinvertebrate fauna of the Sava River, more than 300 species will be confirmed for the Sava River. The data on the distribution of aquatic macroinvertebrates revealed five different stretches—alpine, subalpine, Upper Sava plain, Middle Sava and Lower Sava. Physical habitat degradation, pollution and pressure caused by biological invasions were found to be the main factors of endangerment of aquatic macroinvertebrate fauna diversity. There is an obvious need for further investigation of the Sava River in order to complete the data on aquatic macroinvertebrates and to provide the basis for accurate assessment of environmental status of the river.",
publisher = "Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River",
booktitle = "Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of the Sava River",
volume = "31",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_13",
pages = "335-359"
}
Milačič, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Lucić, A., Paunović, M., Tomović, J., Kovačević, S., Zorić, K., Simić, V., Atanacković, A., Marković, V., Kračun-Kolarević, M., Hudina, S., Lajtner, J., Gottstein, S., Milošević, Đ., Anđus, S., Žganec, K., Jaklič, M., Simčič, T.,& Vilenica, M.. (2015). Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of the Sava River. in The Sava River
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg., 31, 335-359.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_13
Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Lucić A, Paunović M, Tomović J, Kovačević S, Zorić K, Simić V, Atanacković A, Marković V, Kračun-Kolarević M, Hudina S, Lajtner J, Gottstein S, Milošević Đ, Anđus S, Žganec K, Jaklič M, Simčič T, Vilenica M. Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of the Sava River. in The Sava River. 2015;31:335-359.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_13 .
Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Lucić, Andreja, Paunović, Momir, Tomović, Jelena, Kovačević, Simona, Zorić, Katarina, Simić, Vladica, Atanacković, Ana, Marković, Vanja, Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta, Hudina, Sandra, Lajtner, Jasna, Gottstein, Sanja, Milošević, Đurađ, Anđus, Stefan, Žganec, Krešimir, Jaklič, Martina, Simčič, Tatjana, Vilenica, Marina, "Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of the Sava River" in The Sava River, 31 (2015):335-359,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_13 . .
12
15

The Sava River

Milačić, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir

(Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2015)

TY  - BOOK
PY  - 2015
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2473
UR  - http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-662-44034-6
AB  - This volume provides a comprehensive overview of environmental aspects of the Sava River, which is the greatest tributary to the Danube River and the major drainage river system of South Eastern Europe. Hydroelectric power plants, river traffic, intensive agricultural activities, heavy industry and floods have considerable influence on the environment and biota in the basin. Summarizing the results that were gathered in the course of EU, bilateral and national projects, the book highlights the most important stressors and helps readers to better understand the impact of anthropogenic activities on the function of river basins. Topics include: transboundary water cooperation between the riparian countries; climate change projection, including its impact on flood hazards; evaluation of anthropogenic pollution sources; pollution of sediments, metal bioavailability and ecotoxicological and microbiological characterization of the river. The biological part also addresses quality aspects related to wildlife in river aquatic ecosystems (algae, macrophytes, zooplankton, macroinvertebrates and fish) and riparian ecosystems (amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals). The general state of biodiversity and pressures caused by invasive aquatic species are also discussed.
PB  - Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
T2  - The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Volume 31
T1  - The Sava River
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6
EP  - XIV, 506
ER  - 
@book{
editor = "Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
year = "2015, 2015",
abstract = "This volume provides a comprehensive overview of environmental aspects of the Sava River, which is the greatest tributary to the Danube River and the major drainage river system of South Eastern Europe. Hydroelectric power plants, river traffic, intensive agricultural activities, heavy industry and floods have considerable influence on the environment and biota in the basin. Summarizing the results that were gathered in the course of EU, bilateral and national projects, the book highlights the most important stressors and helps readers to better understand the impact of anthropogenic activities on the function of river basins. Topics include: transboundary water cooperation between the riparian countries; climate change projection, including its impact on flood hazards; evaluation of anthropogenic pollution sources; pollution of sediments, metal bioavailability and ecotoxicological and microbiological characterization of the river. The biological part also addresses quality aspects related to wildlife in river aquatic ecosystems (algae, macrophytes, zooplankton, macroinvertebrates and fish) and riparian ecosystems (amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals). The general state of biodiversity and pressures caused by invasive aquatic species are also discussed.",
publisher = "Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer",
journal = "The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Volume 31",
title = "The Sava River",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6",
pages = "XIV, 506"
}
Milačić, R., Ščančar, J.,& Paunović, M.. (2015). The Sava River. in The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Volume 31
Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer..
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6
Milačić R, Ščančar J, Paunović M. The Sava River. in The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Volume 31. 2015;:null-XIV, 506.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6 .
Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, "The Sava River" in The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Volume 31 (2015),
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6 . .
3
17

Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System

Milačić, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Simonović, Predrag; Povž, Metka; Piria, Marina; Treer, Tomislav; Adrović, Avdul; Škrijelj, Rifat; Nikolić, Vera; Simić, Vladica

(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Simonović, Predrag
AU  - Povž, Metka
AU  - Piria, Marina
AU  - Treer, Tomislav
AU  - Adrović, Avdul
AU  - Škrijelj, Rifat
AU  - Nikolić, Vera
AU  - Simić, Vladica
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2577
AB  - On the survey of the recent records, the fish and lamprey fauna of the River Sava catchment consists of 74 species, 15 of which being considered alien. The indigenous species diversity, explained using the relation N = 0. 546 A 0.232, fits well into the range common for large catchments in Europe. Both taxonomic and ecological diversity, as well as the character of fish communities in streams and rivers, are strongly correlated with the stream order. On the relative abundance of species in fish communities, the upper rhithron fish communities cluster distinctly from those belonging to the middle rhithron, within which several subgroups of fish communities were distinguishable. Fish communities of the middle rhithron character in streams and small rivers stand distinctly apart from those belonging to particular sections of large rivers (e.g., the Rivers Sava, Drina, Vrbas, and Bosna), with the transitional type of middle rhithron fish community in larger rivers (e.g., those in the Rivers Una and Sana) that resemble more to the fish communities common in middle rhithron streams. Fish communities in the middle section of the River Sava in Croatia and in the bordering area with Bosnia and Herzegovina mainly belong to the lower rhithron, attaining the character of potamon in the most downstream, Serbian section. River Sava’s fish communities strongly interact with the ones occurring in the most downstream sections of their largest tributaries, e.g., the Rivers Una, Vrbas, Bosna, Drina, and Kolubara, which makes them very similar in structure in the areas of river mouths. Classification of fish communities based solely on the presence and absence of species revealed similar general pattern of fish community classification, though with the more sharp delimitation between those belonging to the upper and middle rhithron on one and to the lower rhithron and potamon on the other side. That was supported by the determination of fish communities belonging to the upper rhithron with brown trout Salmo cf. trutta, European bullhead Cottus gobio, and minnow Phoxinus phoxinus as the most common fish species. Fish communities belonging to the middle rhithron were determined mainly with chub Squalius cephalus and spirlin Alburnoides bipunctatus, whereas brook barbel Barbus balcanicus and stone loach Barbatula barbatula occurred in both upper rhithron and middle rhithron. Nase Chondrostoma nasus were associated with both middle and lower rhithron fish communities. The most common fish species that determine the lower rhithron fish communities were common bream Abramis brama, ide Idus idus, and bleak Alburnus alburnus, with the northern pike Esox lucius, Balon’s ruffe Gymnocephalus baloni, and racer goby Neogobius gymnotrachelus as significant species explaining fish communities of both lower rhithron and potamon. The level of production of fish in the River Sava varies remarkably within the sections with the similar ecological features, as well as between the sections that differ for the type of fish community. The greatest biomass and annual natural production were recorded in the sections homing the potamon and lower rhithron fish communities, especially in the flooding areas of side arms and oxbows which serve as spawning areas and nurseries. A total of 15 alien fish species was recorded in the River Sava catchment, the Prussian carp Carassius gibelio and brown bullhead Ameiurus nebulosus being assessed the most invasive in the areas with the potamon fish community. A strong impact from both long-term and recent stocking with alien hatchery-reared brown trout strains and rainbow trout in the upper rhithron fish communities was recently recognized. Mudminnow Umbra krameri and huchen (or Danube salmon) Hucho hucho are considered the two most threatened fish species of the River Sava catchment, where various types of riverbed modifications, especially the damming, were seen the most prominent threatening factors for fish diversity.
PB  - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T1  - Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14
SP  - 361
EP  - 400
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Simonović, Predrag and Povž, Metka and Piria, Marina and Treer, Tomislav and Adrović, Avdul and Škrijelj, Rifat and Nikolić, Vera and Simić, Vladica",
year = "2015",
abstract = "On the survey of the recent records, the fish and lamprey fauna of the River Sava catchment consists of 74 species, 15 of which being considered alien. The indigenous species diversity, explained using the relation N = 0. 546 A 0.232, fits well into the range common for large catchments in Europe. Both taxonomic and ecological diversity, as well as the character of fish communities in streams and rivers, are strongly correlated with the stream order. On the relative abundance of species in fish communities, the upper rhithron fish communities cluster distinctly from those belonging to the middle rhithron, within which several subgroups of fish communities were distinguishable. Fish communities of the middle rhithron character in streams and small rivers stand distinctly apart from those belonging to particular sections of large rivers (e.g., the Rivers Sava, Drina, Vrbas, and Bosna), with the transitional type of middle rhithron fish community in larger rivers (e.g., those in the Rivers Una and Sana) that resemble more to the fish communities common in middle rhithron streams. Fish communities in the middle section of the River Sava in Croatia and in the bordering area with Bosnia and Herzegovina mainly belong to the lower rhithron, attaining the character of potamon in the most downstream, Serbian section. River Sava’s fish communities strongly interact with the ones occurring in the most downstream sections of their largest tributaries, e.g., the Rivers Una, Vrbas, Bosna, Drina, and Kolubara, which makes them very similar in structure in the areas of river mouths. Classification of fish communities based solely on the presence and absence of species revealed similar general pattern of fish community classification, though with the more sharp delimitation between those belonging to the upper and middle rhithron on one and to the lower rhithron and potamon on the other side. That was supported by the determination of fish communities belonging to the upper rhithron with brown trout Salmo cf. trutta, European bullhead Cottus gobio, and minnow Phoxinus phoxinus as the most common fish species. Fish communities belonging to the middle rhithron were determined mainly with chub Squalius cephalus and spirlin Alburnoides bipunctatus, whereas brook barbel Barbus balcanicus and stone loach Barbatula barbatula occurred in both upper rhithron and middle rhithron. Nase Chondrostoma nasus were associated with both middle and lower rhithron fish communities. The most common fish species that determine the lower rhithron fish communities were common bream Abramis brama, ide Idus idus, and bleak Alburnus alburnus, with the northern pike Esox lucius, Balon’s ruffe Gymnocephalus baloni, and racer goby Neogobius gymnotrachelus as significant species explaining fish communities of both lower rhithron and potamon. The level of production of fish in the River Sava varies remarkably within the sections with the similar ecological features, as well as between the sections that differ for the type of fish community. The greatest biomass and annual natural production were recorded in the sections homing the potamon and lower rhithron fish communities, especially in the flooding areas of side arms and oxbows which serve as spawning areas and nurseries. A total of 15 alien fish species was recorded in the River Sava catchment, the Prussian carp Carassius gibelio and brown bullhead Ameiurus nebulosus being assessed the most invasive in the areas with the potamon fish community. A strong impact from both long-term and recent stocking with alien hatchery-reared brown trout strains and rainbow trout in the upper rhithron fish communities was recently recognized. Mudminnow Umbra krameri and huchen (or Danube salmon) Hucho hucho are considered the two most threatened fish species of the River Sava catchment, where various types of riverbed modifications, especially the damming, were seen the most prominent threatening factors for fish diversity.",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River",
booktitle = "Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14",
pages = "361-400"
}
Milačić, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Simonović, P., Povž, M., Piria, M., Treer, T., Adrović, A., Škrijelj, R., Nikolić, V.,& Simić, V.. (2015). Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System. in The Sava River
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg., 361-400.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14
Milačić R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Simonović P, Povž M, Piria M, Treer T, Adrović A, Škrijelj R, Nikolić V, Simić V. Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System. in The Sava River. 2015;:361-400.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14 .
Milačić, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Simonović, Predrag, Povž, Metka, Piria, Marina, Treer, Tomislav, Adrović, Avdul, Škrijelj, Rifat, Nikolić, Vera, Simić, Vladica, "Ichthyofauna of the River Sava System" in The Sava River (2015):361-400,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_14 . .
17
17

Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin

Milačič, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Simić,Vladica; Petrović, Ana; Erg, Boris; Dimović, Duška; Makovinska, Jarmila; Karadžić, Branko; Paunović, Momir

(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Simić,Vladica
AU  - Petrović, Ana
AU  - Erg, Boris
AU  - Dimović, Duška
AU  - Makovinska, Jarmila
AU  - Karadžić, Branko
AU  - Paunović, Momir
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_17
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2576
AB  - The aim of this chapter is to provide the overview of the water status, state of the biological diversity, and protected areas along the Sava River as well as to underline the necessity of identification and implementation of effective conservation measures. The chapter is based on historical data on environment and recent investigation on macroinvertebrate communities (2011–2012). Ecological status of water bodies within the Sava River basin ranges from high to poor, while the ecological status of the majority of water bodies is assessed as moderate, which indicates the necessity of design and implementation of relevant mitigation measures. The assessment of water quality and ecological status of the river Sava based on the macroinvertebrates community, alongside with the use of several standard biological methods and regional biotic index BNBI indicates a high correlation of the obtained results. BNBI has proven to be a method reliable enough for both the assessment of water quality and the assessment of ecological status of large rivers. Based on the results of water status assessment, the Sava River could be divided into three zones. The best water quality was recorded within the Slovenian stretch of the river, being within the limits of betamesosaprobic zone, while the ecological status was assessed as a good one. The middle part of the Sava River, stretching mainly through Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, has a somewhat worse water quality, approaching the limit of betamesosaprobic zone, while the ecological status in this part of the flow was also determined as a “good” one. The lower parts of the Sava River flow through Serbia are by all indicators more heavily polluted; the water quality is on the border between beta- and alfamesosaprobic zones, while the ecological status is between “good” and “moderate.” The biodiversity of the Sava River may be considered significant, when compared to similar watercourses of Central Europe and Balkan Peninsula. The work contains a more detailed analysis of the biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish of the main flow of the Sava River. Based on the condition of biodiversity of these groups, the river’s ecosystem is divided into three “macrohabitats.” The first macrohabitat includes the upper rhithron parts of the river through Slovenia, with a significant diversity of stenovalent groups of macroinvertebrates (larvae EPT) and salmonid species of fish (brown trout, grayling, and huchen trout). The second macrohabitat includes the parts of the flow through Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina with significant diversity of invertebrates from the groups Odonata, Mollusca, Hirudinea, and Chironomidae and fish from the families of Cyprinidae, Percidae, and Gobiidae. The highest number of protected species of fish has been registered in this section. The third “macrohabitat” includes the lower part of the potamon of the Sava River and mostly flows through Serbia wherein this part of the flow represents the most important habitat of the globally endangered and fishing-wise important sturgeon species of sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) in this river. It is characterized by a decreased biodiversity of macroinvertebrates in the main flow of the river and a significant diversity in the flood zones. In the biodiversity of fish, the highest number of allochthonous species appears. In this section, the diversity of fish in flood zones especially as the habitat of endangered species such as Umbra krameri, Misgurnus fossilis, and Carassius carassius is also important. Research has shown that in order to perform a successful conservation of large river biodiversity, the ecosystem must be observed as a complex consisting of the main flow of the river, flood zone, and its tributaries.
PB  - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T2  - Biodiversity conservation
T2  - Bioindication
T2  - Protected areas
T2  - The Sava River
T2  - Water status
T1  - Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin
VL  - 31
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_17
SP  - 453
EP  - 500
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Simić,Vladica and Petrović, Ana and Erg, Boris and Dimović, Duška and Makovinska, Jarmila and Karadžić, Branko and Paunović, Momir",
year = "2015",
abstract = "The aim of this chapter is to provide the overview of the water status, state of the biological diversity, and protected areas along the Sava River as well as to underline the necessity of identification and implementation of effective conservation measures. The chapter is based on historical data on environment and recent investigation on macroinvertebrate communities (2011–2012). Ecological status of water bodies within the Sava River basin ranges from high to poor, while the ecological status of the majority of water bodies is assessed as moderate, which indicates the necessity of design and implementation of relevant mitigation measures. The assessment of water quality and ecological status of the river Sava based on the macroinvertebrates community, alongside with the use of several standard biological methods and regional biotic index BNBI indicates a high correlation of the obtained results. BNBI has proven to be a method reliable enough for both the assessment of water quality and the assessment of ecological status of large rivers. Based on the results of water status assessment, the Sava River could be divided into three zones. The best water quality was recorded within the Slovenian stretch of the river, being within the limits of betamesosaprobic zone, while the ecological status was assessed as a good one. The middle part of the Sava River, stretching mainly through Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, has a somewhat worse water quality, approaching the limit of betamesosaprobic zone, while the ecological status in this part of the flow was also determined as a “good” one. The lower parts of the Sava River flow through Serbia are by all indicators more heavily polluted; the water quality is on the border between beta- and alfamesosaprobic zones, while the ecological status is between “good” and “moderate.” The biodiversity of the Sava River may be considered significant, when compared to similar watercourses of Central Europe and Balkan Peninsula. The work contains a more detailed analysis of the biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish of the main flow of the Sava River. Based on the condition of biodiversity of these groups, the river’s ecosystem is divided into three “macrohabitats.” The first macrohabitat includes the upper rhithron parts of the river through Slovenia, with a significant diversity of stenovalent groups of macroinvertebrates (larvae EPT) and salmonid species of fish (brown trout, grayling, and huchen trout). The second macrohabitat includes the parts of the flow through Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina with significant diversity of invertebrates from the groups Odonata, Mollusca, Hirudinea, and Chironomidae and fish from the families of Cyprinidae, Percidae, and Gobiidae. The highest number of protected species of fish has been registered in this section. The third “macrohabitat” includes the lower part of the potamon of the Sava River and mostly flows through Serbia wherein this part of the flow represents the most important habitat of the globally endangered and fishing-wise important sturgeon species of sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) in this river. It is characterized by a decreased biodiversity of macroinvertebrates in the main flow of the river and a significant diversity in the flood zones. In the biodiversity of fish, the highest number of allochthonous species appears. In this section, the diversity of fish in flood zones especially as the habitat of endangered species such as Umbra krameri, Misgurnus fossilis, and Carassius carassius is also important. Research has shown that in order to perform a successful conservation of large river biodiversity, the ecosystem must be observed as a complex consisting of the main flow of the river, flood zone, and its tributaries.",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River, Biodiversity conservation, Bioindication, Protected areas, The Sava River, Water status",
booktitle = "Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin",
volume = "31",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_17",
pages = "453-500"
}
Milačič, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Simić, V., Petrović, A., Erg, B., Dimović, D., Makovinska, J., Karadžić, B.,& Paunović, M.. (2015). Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin. in The Sava River
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg., 31, 453-500.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_17
Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Simić V, Petrović A, Erg B, Dimović D, Makovinska J, Karadžić B, Paunović M. Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin. in The Sava River. 2015;31:453-500.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_17 .
Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Simić,Vladica, Petrović, Ana, Erg, Boris, Dimović, Duška, Makovinska, Jarmila, Karadžić, Branko, Paunović, Momir, "Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin" in The Sava River, 31 (2015):453-500,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_17 . .
12
7

Algal Communities Along the Sava River

Milačič, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Simić, Snežana B.; Karadžić, Vesna R.; Cvijan, Mirko V.; Vasiljević, Božica M.

(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Simić, Snežana B.
AU  - Karadžić, Vesna R.
AU  - Cvijan, Mirko V.
AU  - Vasiljević, Božica M.
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_10
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2575
AB  - Field analysis of phytoplankton and phytobenthos communities of the river Sava has been performed, from Slovenia to Serbia, in August 2011 and September 2012 at 20 localities. A total number of 256 taxa have been determined, from eight divisions: Cyanobacteria (20), Rhodophyta (1), Dinophyta (6), Cryptophyta (1), Chrysophyta (1), Bacillariophyta (152), Chlorophyta (67) and Euglenophyta (8). In the phytoplankton samples, 188 taxa have been identified and in the phytobenthos samples 153 taxa. The most diverse divisions of phytoplankton of the river Sava were Bacillariophyta (46.28 % of total taxa number) and Chlorophyta (34.57 % of total taxa number). Biomass of phytoplankton was low, and the abundance of phytoplankton communities varied between 65,000 and 412,000 Ind L−1. The biomass of phytoplankton of the river Sava was in the range of 41 to 564 μg fr. wt. L−1. The phytobenthos dominated by the division of Bacillariophyta, making 81.7 % of the community. Visible macroaggregations were composed of Cladophora glomerata (Chlorophyta) and Thorea hispida (Rhodophyta).
PB  - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T1  - Algal Communities Along the Sava River
VL  - 31
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_10
SP  - 229
EP  - 248
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Simić, Snežana B. and Karadžić, Vesna R. and Cvijan, Mirko V. and Vasiljević, Božica M.",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Field analysis of phytoplankton and phytobenthos communities of the river Sava has been performed, from Slovenia to Serbia, in August 2011 and September 2012 at 20 localities. A total number of 256 taxa have been determined, from eight divisions: Cyanobacteria (20), Rhodophyta (1), Dinophyta (6), Cryptophyta (1), Chrysophyta (1), Bacillariophyta (152), Chlorophyta (67) and Euglenophyta (8). In the phytoplankton samples, 188 taxa have been identified and in the phytobenthos samples 153 taxa. The most diverse divisions of phytoplankton of the river Sava were Bacillariophyta (46.28 % of total taxa number) and Chlorophyta (34.57 % of total taxa number). Biomass of phytoplankton was low, and the abundance of phytoplankton communities varied between 65,000 and 412,000 Ind L−1. The biomass of phytoplankton of the river Sava was in the range of 41 to 564 μg fr. wt. L−1. The phytobenthos dominated by the division of Bacillariophyta, making 81.7 % of the community. Visible macroaggregations were composed of Cladophora glomerata (Chlorophyta) and Thorea hispida (Rhodophyta).",
publisher = "Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River",
booktitle = "Algal Communities Along the Sava River",
volume = "31",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_10",
pages = "229-248"
}
Milačič, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Simić, S. B., Karadžić, V. R., Cvijan, M. V.,& Vasiljević, B. M.. (2015). Algal Communities Along the Sava River. in The Sava River
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg., 31, 229-248.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_10
Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Simić SB, Karadžić VR, Cvijan MV, Vasiljević BM. Algal Communities Along the Sava River. in The Sava River. 2015;31:229-248.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_10 .
Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Simić, Snežana B., Karadžić, Vesna R., Cvijan, Mirko V., Vasiljević, Božica M., "Algal Communities Along the Sava River" in The Sava River, 31 (2015):229-248,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_10 . .
5
7

Aquatic and Wetland Vegetation Along the Sava River

Milačič, Radmila; Ščančar, Janez; Paunović, Momir; Karadžić, Branko; Jarić, Snežana; Pavlović, Pavle; Mitrović, Miroslava

(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Karadžić, Branko
AU  - Jarić, Snežana
AU  - Pavlović, Pavle
AU  - Mitrović, Miroslava
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_11
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2570
AB  - Diverse hydrological, climate, and soil conditions along the Sava River caused significant diversification of vegetation. Therefore, the objective of this chapter is to integrate and present all the available data on variability of the aquatic and riparian plant communities along the Sava River and its main tributaries as well as to identify the environmental factors, which are related to the distribution of different vegetation types. Special attention has been also paid on the detection of threats for rare and endangered plant species and fragile wetland ecosystems along the Sava River. Based on data review, syntaxonomic revision of aquatic and riparian vegetation based on common, pan-European databank is required. Ecological studies that involve inventory, monitoring, modeling, and prediction of changes in populations, ecological communities, and ecosystems require both georeferenced databases and computational tools for application of statistical methods.
PB  - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg
T2  - The Sava River
T1  - Aquatic and Wetland Vegetation Along the Sava River
VL  - 31
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6
SP  - 249
EP  - 316
ER  - 
@inbook{
editor = "Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir",
author = "Karadžić, Branko and Jarić, Snežana and Pavlović, Pavle and Mitrović, Miroslava",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Diverse hydrological, climate, and soil conditions along the Sava River caused significant diversification of vegetation. Therefore, the objective of this chapter is to integrate and present all the available data on variability of the aquatic and riparian plant communities along the Sava River and its main tributaries as well as to identify the environmental factors, which are related to the distribution of different vegetation types. Special attention has been also paid on the detection of threats for rare and endangered plant species and fragile wetland ecosystems along the Sava River. Based on data review, syntaxonomic revision of aquatic and riparian vegetation based on common, pan-European databank is required. Ecological studies that involve inventory, monitoring, modeling, and prediction of changes in populations, ecological communities, and ecosystems require both georeferenced databases and computational tools for application of statistical methods.",
publisher = "Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg",
journal = "The Sava River",
booktitle = "Aquatic and Wetland Vegetation Along the Sava River",
volume = "31",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6",
pages = "249-316"
}
Milačič, R., Ščančar, J., Paunović, M., Karadžić, B., Jarić, S., Pavlović, P.,& Mitrović, M.. (2015). Aquatic and Wetland Vegetation Along the Sava River. in The Sava River
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg., 31, 249-316.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6
Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, Karadžić B, Jarić S, Pavlović P, Mitrović M. Aquatic and Wetland Vegetation Along the Sava River. in The Sava River. 2015;31:249-316.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6 .
Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Paunović, Momir, Karadžić, Branko, Jarić, Snežana, Pavlović, Pavle, Mitrović, Miroslava, "Aquatic and Wetland Vegetation Along the Sava River" in The Sava River, 31 (2015):249-316,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6 . .
3
17