TY  - JOUR
AU  - De Castro-Català, Núria
AU  - Dolédec, Sylvain
AU  - Kalogianni, Eleni
AU  - Skoulikidis, Nikolaos Th.
AU  - Paunović, Momir
AU  - Vasiljević, Božica
AU  - Sabater, Sergi
AU  - Tornés, Elisabet
AU  - Muñoz, Isabel
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969720340651
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3775
AB  - Rivers suffer from more severe decreases in species diversity compared to other aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems due to a variety of pressures related to human activities. Species provide different roles in the functioning of the ecosystem, and their loss may reduce the capacity of the ecosystems to respond to multiple stressors. The effects on diversity will differ based on the type, combination and severity of stressors, as well as on the characteristics of the community composition and tolerance. Multiple trait-based approaches (MTBAs) can help to unravel the effects of multiple stressors on communities, providing a mechanistic interpretation, and, thus, complementing traditional biodiversity assessments using community structure. We studied the relationships between diversity indexes and trait composition of macroinvertebrate and diatom communities, as well as environmental variables that described the hydrological and geomorphological alterations and toxic pollution (pesticides and pharmaceuticals) of three different European river basins: the Adige, the Sava, and the Evrotas. These river basins can be considered representative cases of different situations in European freshwater systems. Hydrological variables were the main drivers determining the community structure and function in the rivers, for both diatoms and macroinvertebrates. For diatom communities, pharmaceutical active compound (PhAC) toxic units were also identified as a very important driver of diversity changes, explaining up to 57% of the variance in taxonomic richness. For macroinvertebrates, river geomorphology was an important driver of structural changes, particularly affecting Plecoptera richness. In addition, PhAC and pesticide toxic units were also identified as stressors for macroinvertebrate communities. MTBA provided a detailed picture of the effects of the stressors on the communities and confirmed the importance of hydrological variables in shaping the functional attributes of the communities.
T2  - Science of The Total Environment
T2  - Science of The Total Environment
T1  - Unravelling the effects of multiple stressors on diatom and macroinvertebrate communities in European river basins using structural and functional approaches
VL  - 742
DO  - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140543
SP  - 140543
ER  - 

@article{
author = "De Castro-Català, Núria and Dolédec, Sylvain and Kalogianni, Eleni and Skoulikidis, Nikolaos Th. and Paunović, Momir and Vasiljević, Božica and Sabater, Sergi and Tornés, Elisabet and Muñoz, Isabel",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Rivers suffer from more severe decreases in species diversity compared to other aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems due to a variety of pressures related to human activities. Species provide different roles in the functioning of the ecosystem, and their loss may reduce the capacity of the ecosystems to respond to multiple stressors. The effects on diversity will differ based on the type, combination and severity of stressors, as well as on the characteristics of the community composition and tolerance. Multiple trait-based approaches (MTBAs) can help to unravel the effects of multiple stressors on communities, providing a mechanistic interpretation, and, thus, complementing traditional biodiversity assessments using community structure. We studied the relationships between diversity indexes and trait composition of macroinvertebrate and diatom communities, as well as environmental variables that described the hydrological and geomorphological alterations and toxic pollution (pesticides and pharmaceuticals) of three different European river basins: the Adige, the Sava, and the Evrotas. These river basins can be considered representative cases of different situations in European freshwater systems. Hydrological variables were the main drivers determining the community structure and function in the rivers, for both diatoms and macroinvertebrates. For diatom communities, pharmaceutical active compound (PhAC) toxic units were also identified as a very important driver of diversity changes, explaining up to 57% of the variance in taxonomic richness. For macroinvertebrates, river geomorphology was an important driver of structural changes, particularly affecting Plecoptera richness. In addition, PhAC and pesticide toxic units were also identified as stressors for macroinvertebrate communities. MTBA provided a detailed picture of the effects of the stressors on the communities and confirmed the importance of hydrological variables in shaping the functional attributes of the communities.",
journal = "Science of The Total Environment, Science of The Total Environment",
title = "Unravelling the effects of multiple stressors on diatom and macroinvertebrate communities in European river basins using structural and functional approaches",
volume = "742",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140543",
pages = "140543"
}

De Castro-Català, N., Dolédec, S., Kalogianni, E., Skoulikidis, N. Th., Paunović, M., Vasiljević, B., Sabater, S., Tornés, E.,& Muñoz, I.. (2020). Unravelling the effects of multiple stressors on diatom and macroinvertebrate communities in European river basins using structural and functional approaches. in Science of The Total Environment, 742, 140543.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140543

De Castro-Català N, Dolédec S, Kalogianni E, Skoulikidis NT, Paunović M, Vasiljević B, Sabater S, Tornés E, Muñoz I. Unravelling the effects of multiple stressors on diatom and macroinvertebrate communities in European river basins using structural and functional approaches. in Science of The Total Environment. 2020;742:140543.
doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140543 .

De Castro-Català, Núria, Dolédec, Sylvain, Kalogianni, Eleni, Skoulikidis, Nikolaos Th., Paunović, Momir, Vasiljević, Božica, Sabater, Sergi, Tornés, Elisabet, Muñoz, Isabel, "Unravelling the effects of multiple stressors on diatom and macroinvertebrate communities in European river basins using structural and functional approaches" in Science of The Total Environment, 742 (2020):140543,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140543 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - von Schiller, Daniel
AU  - Acuña, Vicenç
AU  - Aristi, Ibon
AU  - Arroita, Maite
AU  - Basaguren, Ana
AU  - Bellin, Alberto
AU  - Boyero, Luz
AU  - Butturini, Andrea
AU  - Ginebreda, Antoni
AU  - Kalogianni, Eleni
AU  - Larrañaga, Aitor
AU  - Majone, Bruno
AU  - Martínez, Aingeru
AU  - Monroy, Silvia
AU  - Muñoz, Isabel
AU  - Paunović, Momir
AU  - Pereda, Olatz
AU  - Petrović, Mira
AU  - Pozo, Jesús
AU  - Rodríguez-Mozaz, Sara
AU  - Rivas, Daniel
AU  - Sabater, Sergi
AU  - Sabater, Francesc
AU  - Skoulikidis, Nikolaos
AU  - Solagaistua, Libe
AU  - Vardakas, Leonidas
AU  - Elosegi, Arturo
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969717309191
UR  - https://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2743
AB  - River ecosystems are subject to multiple stressors that affect their structure and functioning. Ecosystem structure refers to characteristics such as channel form, water quality or the composition of biological communities, whereas ecosystem functioning refers to processes such as metabolism, organic matter decomposition or secondary production. Structure and functioning respond in contrasting and complementary ways to environmental stressors. Moreover, assessing the response of ecosystem functioning to stressors is critical to understand the effects on the ecosystem services that produce direct benefits to humans. Yet, there is more information on structural than on functional parameters, and despite the many approaches available to measure river ecosystem processes, structural approaches are more widely used, especially in management. One reason for this discrepancy is the lack of synthetic studies analyzing river ecosystem functioning in a way that is useful for both scientists and managers. Here, we present a synthesis of key river ecosystem processes, which provides a description of the main characteristics of each process, including criteria guiding their measurement as well as their respective sensitivity to stressors. We also discuss the current limitations, potential improvements and future steps that the use of functional measures in rivers needs to face.
T2  - Science of The Total Environment
T1  - River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors
VL  - 596-597
DO  - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.081
SP  - 465
EP  - 480
ER  - 

@article{
author = "von Schiller, Daniel and Acuña, Vicenç and Aristi, Ibon and Arroita, Maite and Basaguren, Ana and Bellin, Alberto and Boyero, Luz and Butturini, Andrea and Ginebreda, Antoni and Kalogianni, Eleni and Larrañaga, Aitor and Majone, Bruno and Martínez, Aingeru and Monroy, Silvia and Muñoz, Isabel and Paunović, Momir and Pereda, Olatz and Petrović, Mira and Pozo, Jesús and Rodríguez-Mozaz, Sara and Rivas, Daniel and Sabater, Sergi and Sabater, Francesc and Skoulikidis, Nikolaos and Solagaistua, Libe and Vardakas, Leonidas and Elosegi, Arturo",
year = "2017",
abstract = "River ecosystems are subject to multiple stressors that affect their structure and functioning. Ecosystem structure refers to characteristics such as channel form, water quality or the composition of biological communities, whereas ecosystem functioning refers to processes such as metabolism, organic matter decomposition or secondary production. Structure and functioning respond in contrasting and complementary ways to environmental stressors. Moreover, assessing the response of ecosystem functioning to stressors is critical to understand the effects on the ecosystem services that produce direct benefits to humans. Yet, there is more information on structural than on functional parameters, and despite the many approaches available to measure river ecosystem processes, structural approaches are more widely used, especially in management. One reason for this discrepancy is the lack of synthetic studies analyzing river ecosystem functioning in a way that is useful for both scientists and managers. Here, we present a synthesis of key river ecosystem processes, which provides a description of the main characteristics of each process, including criteria guiding their measurement as well as their respective sensitivity to stressors. We also discuss the current limitations, potential improvements and future steps that the use of functional measures in rivers needs to face.",
journal = "Science of The Total Environment",
title = "River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors",
volume = "596-597",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.081",
pages = "465-480"
}

von Schiller, D., Acuña, V., Aristi, I., Arroita, M., Basaguren, A., Bellin, A., Boyero, L., Butturini, A., Ginebreda, A., Kalogianni, E., Larrañaga, A., Majone, B., Martínez, A., Monroy, S., Muñoz, I., Paunović, M., Pereda, O., Petrović, M., Pozo, J., Rodríguez-Mozaz, S., Rivas, D., Sabater, S., Sabater, F., Skoulikidis, N., Solagaistua, L., Vardakas, L.,& Elosegi, A.. (2017). River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors. in Science of The Total Environment, 596-597, 465-480.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.081

von Schiller D, Acuña V, Aristi I, Arroita M, Basaguren A, Bellin A, Boyero L, Butturini A, Ginebreda A, Kalogianni E, Larrañaga A, Majone B, Martínez A, Monroy S, Muñoz I, Paunović M, Pereda O, Petrović M, Pozo J, Rodríguez-Mozaz S, Rivas D, Sabater S, Sabater F, Skoulikidis N, Solagaistua L, Vardakas L, Elosegi A. River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors. in Science of The Total Environment. 2017;596-597:465-480.
doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.081 .

von Schiller, Daniel, Acuña, Vicenç, Aristi, Ibon, Arroita, Maite, Basaguren, Ana, Bellin, Alberto, Boyero, Luz, Butturini, Andrea, Ginebreda, Antoni, Kalogianni, Eleni, Larrañaga, Aitor, Majone, Bruno, Martínez, Aingeru, Monroy, Silvia, Muñoz, Isabel, Paunović, Momir, Pereda, Olatz, Petrović, Mira, Pozo, Jesús, Rodríguez-Mozaz, Sara, Rivas, Daniel, Sabater, Sergi, Sabater, Francesc, Skoulikidis, Nikolaos, Solagaistua, Libe, Vardakas, Leonidas, Elosegi, Arturo, "River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors" in Science of The Total Environment, 596-597 (2017):465-480,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.081 . .