Bilateral project of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Slovenia (BI-RS/18-19-029)

Link to this page

Bilateral project of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Slovenia (BI-RS/18-19-029)

Authors

Publications

In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study

Jovanović Marić, Jovana; Kolarević, Stoimir; Đorđević, Jelena; Sunjog, Karolina; Nikolić, Ivan; Marić, Ana; Ilić, Marija; Simonović, Predrag; Alygizakis, Nikiforos; Ng, Kelsey; Oswald, Peter; Slobodnik, Jaroslav; Žegura, Bojana; Vuković-Gačić, Branka; Paunović, Momir; Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta

(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jovanović Marić, Jovana
AU  - Kolarević, Stoimir
AU  - Đorđević, Jelena
AU  - Sunjog, Karolina
AU  - Nikolić, Ivan
AU  - Marić, Ana
AU  - Ilić, Marija
AU  - Simonović, Predrag
AU  - Alygizakis, Nikiforos
AU  - Ng, Kelsey
AU  - Oswald, Peter
AU  - Slobodnik, Jaroslav
AU  - Žegura, Bojana
AU  - Vuković-Gačić, Branka
AU  - Paunović, Momir
AU  - Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://academic.oup.com/mutage/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mutage/geac024/6823671
UR  - http://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5243
AB  - Environmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological status/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies.
PB  - Oxford: Oxford University Press
T2  - Mutagenesis
T1  - In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study
IS  - 1
VL  - 38
DO  - 10.1093/mutage/geac024
SP  - 21
EP  - 32
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jovanović Marić, Jovana and Kolarević, Stoimir and Đorđević, Jelena and Sunjog, Karolina and Nikolić, Ivan and Marić, Ana and Ilić, Marija and Simonović, Predrag and Alygizakis, Nikiforos and Ng, Kelsey and Oswald, Peter and Slobodnik, Jaroslav and Žegura, Bojana and Vuković-Gačić, Branka and Paunović, Momir and Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Environmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological status/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies.",
publisher = "Oxford: Oxford University Press",
journal = "Mutagenesis",
title = "In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study",
number = "1",
volume = "38",
doi = "10.1093/mutage/geac024",
pages = "21-32"
}
Jovanović Marić, J., Kolarević, S., Đorđević, J., Sunjog, K., Nikolić, I., Marić, A., Ilić, M., Simonović, P., Alygizakis, N., Ng, K., Oswald, P., Slobodnik, J., Žegura, B., Vuković-Gačić, B., Paunović, M.,& Kračun-Kolarević, M.. (2023). In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study. in Mutagenesis
Oxford: Oxford University Press., 38(1), 21-32.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac024
Jovanović Marić J, Kolarević S, Đorđević J, Sunjog K, Nikolić I, Marić A, Ilić M, Simonović P, Alygizakis N, Ng K, Oswald P, Slobodnik J, Žegura B, Vuković-Gačić B, Paunović M, Kračun-Kolarević M. In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study. in Mutagenesis. 2023;38(1):21-32.
doi:10.1093/mutage/geac024 .
Jovanović Marić, Jovana, Kolarević, Stoimir, Đorđević, Jelena, Sunjog, Karolina, Nikolić, Ivan, Marić, Ana, Ilić, Marija, Simonović, Predrag, Alygizakis, Nikiforos, Ng, Kelsey, Oswald, Peter, Slobodnik, Jaroslav, Žegura, Bojana, Vuković-Gačić, Branka, Paunović, Momir, Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta, "In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study" in Mutagenesis, 38, no. 1 (2023):21-32,
https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac024 . .
3