Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorHeberger, Karoly
dc.creatorKolarevic, Stoimir
dc.creatorKračun-Kolarević, Margareta
dc.creatorSunjog, Karolina
dc.creatorGacic, Zoran
dc.creatorKljajic, Zoran
dc.creatorMitric, Milena
dc.creatorVukovic-Gacic, Branka
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-23T11:00:24Z
dc.date.available2015-06-21
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1879-3592
dc.identifier.urihttps://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2165
dc.description.abstractSpecimens of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis were collected from five sites in the Boka Kotorska Bay (Adriatic Sea, Montenegro) during the period summer 2011-autumn 2012. Three types of tissue, haemolymph, digestive gland were used for assessment of DNA damage. Images of randomly selected cells were analyzed with a fluorescence microscope and image analysis by the Comet Assay IV Image-analysis system. Three parameters, viz, tail length, tail intensity and Olive tail moment were analyzed on 4200 nuclei per cell type. We observed variations in the level of DNA damage in mussels collected at different sites, as well as seasonal variations in response. Sum of ranking differences (SRD) was implemented to compare use of different types of cell and different measure of comet tail per nucleus. Numerical scales were transferred into ranks, range scaling between 0 and 1; standardization and normalization were carried out. SRD selected the best (and worst) combinations: tail moment is the best for all data treatment and for all organs; second best is tail length, and intensity ranks third (except for digestive gland). The differences were significant at the 5\% level. Whereas gills and haemolymph cells do not differ significantly, cells of the digestive gland are much more suitable to estimate genotoxicity. Variance analysis decomposed the effect of different factors on the SRD values. This unique combination has provided not only the relative importance of factors, but also an overall evaluation: the best evaluation method, the best data pre-treatment, etc., were chosen even for partially contradictory data. The rank transformation is superior to any other way of scaling, which is proven by ordering the SRD values by SRD again, and by cross validation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Science of Montenegro; OTKA (Hungarian Scientific - Research Foundation) {[}K112547]
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsembargoedAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceMutation Research-Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
dc.subjectEcogenotoxicity
dc.subjectComet assay
dc.subjectAnalysis of variance
dc.subjectRanking
dc.subjectFluorescence
dc.subjectMussels
dc.titleEvaluation of single-cell gel electrophoresis data: Combination of variance analysis with sum of ranking differencesen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractВуковиц-Гациц, Бранка; Хебергер, Каролy; Коларевиц, Стоимир; Суњог, Каролина; Гациц, Зоран; Кљајиц, Зоран; Митриц, Милена; Крачун-Коларевић, Маргарета;
dc.rights.holder© 2014 Elsevier B.V.
dc.citation.volume771
dc.description.noteThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Héberger K, Kolarević S, Kračun-Kolarević M, Sunjog K, Gačić Z, Kljajić Z, Mitrić M, Vuković-Gačić B. Evaluation of single-cell gel electrophoresis data: Combination of variance analysis with sum of ranking differences. Mutat Res Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2014;771:15–22. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.04.028]
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.04.028
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84904387700
dc.identifier.wos000341471100003
dc.citation.spage15
dc.citation.epage22
dc.type.versionacceptedVersionen
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/5703/MusselKometSRDrevision_KS1_SK5_KH9realba.pdf


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу