Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorMontauban, Cecilia
dc.creatorMas, Maria
dc.creatorTuneu-Corral, Carme
dc.creatorWangensteen, Owen S.
dc.creatorBudinski, Ivana
dc.creatorMartí-Carreras, Joan
dc.creatorFlaquer, Carles
dc.creatorPuig-Montserrat, Xavier
dc.creatorLópez-Baucells, Adrià
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-29T09:31:16Z
dc.date.available2021-03-29T09:31:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0340-5443
dc.identifier.urihttps://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4169
dc.description.abstractAnimals modify their behaviours and interactions in response to changing environments. In bats, environmental adaptations are reflected in echolocation signalling that is used for navigation, foraging and communication. However, the extent and drivers of echolocation plasticity are not fully understood, hindering our identification of bat species with ultrasonic detectors, particularly for cryptic species with similar echolocation calls. We used a combination of DNA barcoding, intensive trapping, roost and emergence surveys and acoustic recording to study a widespread European cryptic species complex (Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Pipistrellus pygmaeus) to investigate whether sibling bat species could exhibit extreme echolocation plasticity in response to certain environmental conditions or behaviours. We found that P. pygmaeus occupied the acoustic niche of their absent congeneric species, producing calls with P. pipistrellus’ characteristic structure and peak frequencies and resulting in false positive acoustic records of that species. Echolocation frequency was significantly affected by the density of bats and by maternity rearing stage, with lower frequency calls emitted when there was a high density of flying bats, and by mothers while juveniles were non-volant. During roost emergence, 29% of calls had peak frequencies typical of P. pipistrellus, with calls as low as 44 kHz, lower than ever documented. We show that automatic and manual call classifiers fail to account for echolocation plasticity, misidentifying P. pygmaeus as P. pipistrellus. Our study raises a vital limitation of using only acoustic sampling in areas with high densities of a single species of a cryptic species pair, with important implications for bat monitoring.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherSpringer Naturesr
dc.relationCatalan government and theGranollers Natural Sciences Museum (convention reference DB201804)sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiologysr
dc.subjectBioacousticssr
dc.subjectAutomatic classifierssr
dc.subjectMetabarcodingsr
dc.subjectCall variabilitysr
dc.subjectConspecificssr
dc.subjectPipistrellussr
dc.titleBat echolocation plasticity in allopatry: a call for caution in acoustic identification of Pipistrellus sp.sr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dcterms.abstractWангенстеен, Оwен С.; Мартí-Царрерас, Јоан; Флаqуер, Царлес; Пуиг-Монтсеррат, Xавиер; Лóпез-Бауцеллс, Aдриà; Монтаубан, Цецилиа; Мас, Мариа; Тунеу-Цоррал, Царме; Будински, Ивана;
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorssr
dc.citation.volume75
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00265-021-03002-7
dc.identifier.wos000632768000002
dc.citation.apaMontauban, C., Mas, M., Tuneu-Corral, C., Wangensteen, O. S., Budinski, I., Martí-Carreras, J., et al. (2021). Bat echolocation plasticity in allopatry: a call for caution in acoustic identification of Pipistrellus sp. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75(4), 70.
dc.citation.vancouverMontauban C, Mas M, Tuneu-Corral C, Wangensteen OS, Budinski I, Martí-Carreras J, Flaquer C, Puig-Montserrat X, López-Baucells A. Bat echolocation plasticity in allopatry: a call for caution in acoustic identification of Pipistrellus sp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2021;75(4):70.
dc.citation.spage70
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/8292/bitstream_8292.pdf
dc.citation.rankaM21


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу