Show simple item record

Terpenski odnosi između nekih mekih i tvrdih borova

dc.creatorKrstić, Gordana
dc.creatorNikolić, Biljana
dc.creatorTodosijević, Marina
dc.creatorMitić, Zorica
dc.creatorStankovic-Jeremic, Jovana
dc.creatorCvetkovic, Mirjana
dc.creatorBojović, Srđan
dc.creatorMarin, Petar
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-26T13:41:20Z
dc.date.available2022-05-26T13:41:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1821-2158
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?ID=1821-21582201039K
dc.identifier.urihttp://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4968
dc.description.abstractIn this study we have reported the chemical composition of the essential oils obtained from the needles of twelve Pinus taxa, belonging to the subgenera Pinus (sections Pinus and Trifoliae) and Strobus (sect. Quinquefoliae). Monoterpenes dominated over sesquiterpenes in most of the investigated taxa of both subgenera, except in representatives of the subsection Pinaster, subgenus Pinus. alpha-Pinene was the most abundant terpene in eight pines, but other dominant terpenes were found in some taxa -trans-caryophyllene, germacrene D, abietadiene and beta-pinene. In the subsect. Pinaster, the most dominant compounds varied from species to species. In addition, P. halepensis and P. pinaster had the highest percentage of diterpenes, while P. heldreichii was the richest in germacrene D. In the PCA and cluster analyses, three species from the subsect. Pinaster emerged as the most distant: P. halepensis, P. pinaster, and P. heldreichii. In addition, the possible taxonomic implications of the terpene profile in the analysed Pinus taxa were also discussed.en
dc.description.abstract48 |vol. 46 (1) U ovom proučavanju objavili smo hemijski sastav etarskih ulja dobijenih iz iglica 12 taksona roda Pinus, koji pripadaju podrodovima Pinus (sekcije Pinus i Trifoliae) i Strobus (sekcija Quinquefoliae). U većini istraživanih taksona monoterpeni dominiraju nad seskviterpenima kod oba podroda, osim kod uzoraka podsekcije Pinaster podroda Pinus. α-Pinen je najobilniji kod 8 borova, ali kod nekih taksona dominantni su trans-kariofilen, germakren D, abietadien i β-pinen. U subcekciji Pinaster dominantne komponente variraju od vrste do vrste. Nadalje, P. ha- lepensis i P. pinaster imaju najveći procenat diterpena, dok je P. heldreichii najbogatiji u germakrenu D. U PCA i klaster analizama pokazale su se najudaljenije tri vrste subsekcije Pinaster: P. halepensis, P. pinaster i P. heldreichii. Nadalje, u analiziranim vrstama roda Pinus diskutovane su moguće taksonomske implikacije terpenskog profila.sr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200007/RS//
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200124/RS//
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200168/RS//
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200178/RS//
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceBotanica Serbica
dc.subjectCanonical discriminant analysisen
dc.subjectCluster analysisen
dc.subjectDiversityen
dc.subjectPinusen
dc.subjectPrincipal component analysisen
dc.subjectPinussr
dc.subjectDiverzitetsr
dc.subjectAnaliza glavnih komponentisr
dc.subjectKanonijska diskriminantna analizasr
dc.subjectKlaster analizasr
dc.titleTerpene relationships among some soft and hard pine speciesen
dc.titleTerpenski odnosi između nekih mekih i tvrdih borovasr
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden Jevremovac, Belgrade
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume46
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/BOTSERB2201039K
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129721226
dc.identifier.wos000791770200005
dc.citation.apaKrstic, G., Nikolic, B., Todosijevic, M., Mitic, Z., Stankovic-Jeremic, J., Cvetkovic, M., et al. (2022). Terpene relationships among some soft and hard pine species. Botanica Serbica, 46(1), 39–48.
dc.citation.vancouverKrstic G, Nikolic B, Todosijevic M, Mitic Z, Stankovic-Jeremic J, Cvetkovic M, Bojovic S, Marin P. Terpene relationships among some soft and hard pine species. Bot Serbica. 2022;46(1):39–48.
dc.citation.spage39
dc.citation.epage48
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/10586/1821-21582201039K.pdf
dc.citation.rankM23


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record