Show simple item record

dc.creatorJovanović Marić, Jovana
dc.creatorKolarević, Stoimir
dc.creatorĐorđević, Jelena
dc.creatorSunjog, Karolina
dc.creatorNikolić, Ivan
dc.creatorMarić, Ana
dc.creatorIlić, Marija
dc.creatorSimonović, Predrag
dc.creatorAlygizakis, Nikiforos
dc.creatorNg, Kelsey
dc.creatorOswald, Peter
dc.creatorSlobodnik, Jaroslav
dc.creatorŽegura, Bojana
dc.creatorVuković-Gačić, Branka
dc.creatorPaunović, Momir
dc.creatorKračun-Kolarević, Margareta
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T12:49:51Z
dc.date.available2900-01-01
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0267-8357
dc.identifier.urihttps://academic.oup.com/mutage/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mutage/geac024/6823671
dc.identifier.urihttp://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5243
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological status/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies.
dc.publisherOxford: Oxford University Press
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200007/RS//
dc.relationBilateral project of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Slovenia (BI-RS/18-19-029)
dc.relationSlovenian Research Agency (Program P1-0245)
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceMutagenesis
dc.subjectAlburnus alburnus
dc.subjectJoint Danube Survey 4
dc.subjectcomet assay
dc.subjectgenotoxic potential
dc.subjectweight-of-evidence approach
dc.titleIn situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society.
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume38
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/mutage/geac024
dc.identifier.pmid36367406
dc.identifier.wos000881717300001
dc.citation.apaJovanović Marić, J., Kolarević, S., Đorđević, J., Sunjog, K., Nikolić, I., Marić, A., et al. (2023). In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study. Mutagenesis. 38(1), 21-32.
dc.citation.vancouverJovanović Marić J, Kolarević S, Đorđević J, Sunjog K, Nikolić I, Marić A, Ilić M, Simonović P, Alygizakis N, Ng K, Oswald P, Slobodnik J, Žegura B, Vuković-Gačić B, Paunović M, Kračun-Kolarević M. In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study. Mutagenesis. 2023;38(1):21-32.
dc.citation.spage21
dc.citation.epage32
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.citation.rankM22~


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record