Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorKračun-Kolarević, Margareta
dc.creatorJovanović Marić, Jovana
dc.creatorOswald, Petar
dc.creatorOswaldova, Martina
dc.creatorSlobodnik, Jaroslav
dc.creatorVuković-Gačić, Branka
dc.creatorPaunović, Momir
dc.creatorKološa, Katja
dc.creatorŽegura, Bojana
dc.creatorKolarević, Stoimir
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T07:12:35Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T07:12:35Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5725
dc.description.abstractWithin the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) (2019) surface water samples were collected at 24 localities along the Danube River and were extracted by horizon large volume solid-phase extraction (LVSPE) technique. LVSPE technique provided 25,000x relative enrichment factor (REF) of the river samples. The bioactivity of the LVSPE samples was investigated employing prokaryotic SOS/umuC assay (S9+ and S9-) and battery of bioassays analyzing different endpoints – cytotoxicity (MTS assay), genotoxicity (comet assay), cell cycle analyses of ZFL cells and embryo toxicity (zFET) in eukaryotic models (zebrafish liver cell line – ZFL and Danio rerio embryos – zebrafish). In the case of the SOS/umuC assay none of the tested samples (REF100) has induced genotoxic effect. The cytotoxic effect was detected for 11 samples at REF100 (MTS assay). The comet assay results indicated genotoxic potential for nine samples – one in the Upper Danube, six in the Middle Danube and two in the Lower Danube. The most potent were JDS4-37 and JDS4-41 samples collected at two sites in the Serbian part of the Danube River. These samples were analyzed at REF13. The analysis of the cell cycle was performed in the case of eight samples for which were previously recorded genotoxic effect. For one sample (JDS4-41) was found the G1 phase cell cycle arrest. The zFET assay was performed for all the samples at REF100 and there was no embryo toxicity or teratogenicity recorded. The results obtained within this study indicate a higher sensitivity of eukaryotic models compared to prokaryotic SOS/umuC assay. Likewise, it was found that most of the genotoxic samples originate from the middle part of the Danube.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherEuropean Environmental Mutagenesis & Genomics Societysr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceJoint EEMGS meeting & International Comet Assay Workshop; 2022 May 23-26; Maastricht, The Netherlandssr
dc.titleBioactivity of the Joint Danube Survey 4 surface water samples collected by horizon large volume solid–phase extraction technique.sr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dc.rights.holder© 2022 by the European Environmental Mutagenesis & Genomics Societysr
dc.description.otherJoint EEMGS meeting & International Comet Assay Workshop; 2022 May 23-26; Maastricht, The Netherlands. European Environmental Mutagenesis & Genomics Society; 2022. p. 75.sr
dc.citation.spage75
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/17661/bitstream_17661.pdf
dc.citation.rankM34
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ibiss_5725


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу