Show simple item record

dc.creatorKolarević, Stoimir
dc.creatorKračun-Kolarević, Margareta
dc.creatorOswald, Peter
dc.creatorSlobodnik, Jaroslav
dc.creatorPaunović, Momir
dc.creatorVuković-Gačić, Branka
dc.creatorŽegura, Bojana
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-31T10:37:45Z
dc.date.available2023-10-31T10:37:45Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-914897-8-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6233
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Prokaryotic assays are of great interest in eco/geno-toxicology as they are short-term, simple and cost effective. Application of strains of Salmonella typhimurium with modifications such as increased cell wall permeability and lack of excision repair system is common for the detection of genotoxicity. Various eukaryotic models have been developed lately, such as fish derived cell lines, which can mimic the response of the aquatic organisms. Considering different level of cell organization among these models, difference in sensitivity is expected, yet only few studies address this topic. OBJECTIVES The major objective was to investigate genotoxic potential of extracts of surface water of the Danube and to compare the results obtained in applied prokaryotic and eukaryotic models. METHODS Surface water samples from 24 sites along the Danube River were extracted by LVSPE Horizon sampler providing relative enrichment factor (REF) of the extracts of 25,000x. For representative prokaryotic model the SOS/umuC assay with S. typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002 was used. Eukaryotic model comprised assessment of cytotoxicity by MTS test and assessment of genotoxicity by comet assay in ZFL (ZebraFish Liver) cells. RESULTS While none of the tested samples has induced SOS response, the result of MTS assay indicated that 11 of 24 samples were cytotoxic. In comet assay, genotoxic potential was found in 9 of 24 samples. Results indicated higher sensitivity of used eukaryotic model in comparison with prokaryotic. Applied prokaryotic assay is often suggested to be used as prescreening tool in diagnostics of genotoxic potential which by our opinion could be misleading.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherBelgrade: Serbian Society of Microbiologysr
dc.relationThis research was supported by FEMS Research Training Grant program.sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceElectronic abstract book: FEMS Conference on Microbiology in association with Serbian Society of Microbiology; 2022 Jun 30 - Jul 2; Belgrade, Serbiasr
dc.subjectgenotoxicitysr
dc.subjectDanube Riversr
dc.subjectSOS/umuCsr
dc.subjectzebrafishsr
dc.titleComparative in vitro evaluation of genotoxic potential of the Danube River water extracts in prokaryotic and eukaryotic assayssr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dc.rights.holder© 2022 by the Serbian Society of Microbiologysr
dc.description.otherElectronic abstract book: FEMS Conference on Microbiology in association with Serbian Society of Microbiology; 2022 Jun 30 - Jul 2; Belgrade, Serbia. Belgrade: Serbian Society of Microbiology; 2022. p. 160-1.sr
dc.citation.spage160
dc.citation.epage161
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://radar.ibiss.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/17664/bitstream_17664.pdf
dc.citation.rankM34
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ibiss_6233


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record